Friday, September 2, 2011

The Waste Land by T.S. Eliot

Thomas Stearns Eliot wrote The Waste Land in 1922. Ultimately, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1948. Mary Karr, in the introduction to The Modern Library edition says the boundary between 20th century verse in English and it's 19th century predecessors came down with an axe swoop and the blade was T.S. Eliot's "Waste Land." Some believe The Waste Land to stand alone with Joyce's Ulysses as the greatest works of modernist literature. William Carlos Williams said the poem "wiped out our world as if an atom bomb had been dropped upon it." Karr also admits it is the gold standard for difficulty. She says "I've been as guilty as any critic or academic of invoking the poem in essays and lectures as a voodoo mojo to vanquish the lesser spirits of my own intellectual insecurity."

Karr explains how to read The Waste Land. Treat it like a first date - only if you fall in love do you make a study of the beloved. The poem is a collage, with disparate pieces assembled to create in readers the kind of despair that infected Western Europe after WW1. Chemical weaponry had broadened the War's scope. Airplanes could fly over and dismantle troops. The glory of dying for one's country was a thing of the past. Karr views the poem as a vaccine against the horror it describes by injecting a nonlethal dosage.

Expect Eliot's text to be disorienting as battle. The narrator keeps changing through the stanzas. The poem's made of bits and overlays snatches of speech and songs - just as cities were. We see a sibyl pronouncing in Greek her longing to die. We hear an Australian drinking song. We hear Dante's language and pub chitchat. Homer's blind seer Tiresias acts as voyeur, a wacky clairvoyante makes the scene with a bogus tarot pack.

In order to add some length to the 433-line poem for book presentation, Eliot added notes that have generated an antlike industry of Ph.D. candidates for generations. Eliot dropped these notes like bread crumbs to entice and/or intimidate critics. Karr describes grad students looking to source the notes as comparable to dogs loping after any thrown Frisbee.

I have included the complete poem below in red and have interspersed comments within the text.

The Waste Land

Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis

vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent:
Σίβυλλα τί θέλεις; respondebat illa: ἀποθανεῖν θέλω.

[The epigraph in Latin and Greek is from Petronius Arbiter's Satyricon. In the story, Sybil asks Apollo for as many years of life as possible, but forgets to ask that she keep her youth. The Latin and Greek translates to "For once I saw with my own eyes the Cumean Sybil hanging in a jar, and when the boys asked her, 'Sibyl, what do you want?' she answered 'I want to die.'" Already, before the first verse, we have a key theme of rebirth after death. For Sybil, death alone offers a means of escape. The Sybil's predicament mirrors what Eliot sees as his own: he lives in a culture that has decayed and withered but will not expire. He is forced to live with reminders of his former glory. Of course, this tees us up for the major theme of the first chapter: death. The first chapter consists of 4 vignettes, each from the perspective of a different speaker.]

The title comes from the Anglican Book of Common Prayer. 1st vignette: The opening line is famous and is curious. Those familiar with Chaucer’s poem The Canterbury Tales will recognize that Eliot is taking Chaucer’s introductory line from the prologue—which is optimistic about the month of April and the regenerative, life-giving season of spring—and turning it on its head. Just as Chaucer’s line sets the tone for The Canterbury Tales, Eliot’s dark words inform the reader that this is going to be a dark poem. Knowledge of the better things in life (love, rebirth) that are represented by Spring causes deep anxiety in the mind of the narrator living in a post War era. "Memory and desire" mix in a very forlorn fashion. In the first stanza, the narrator, an aristocratic woman. Marie, clings to life through her memories, the Starnbergersee (lake in Munich), sledding with his cousin, etc. The Hofgarten memory precipitates a flurry of grammar, including the German phrase which translates as "I'm not Russian at all, I come from Lithuania, a true German." This line is nonsensical, as Lithuania is not part of Germany. Yet, eerily, this line anticipates Europe's identity crisis nearly a century forward.]

I. THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD

APRIL is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.
Winter kept us warm, covering
Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
A little life with dried tubers.
Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee
With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade,
And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,
And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.
Bin gar keine Russin, stammaus Litauen, echt deutsch.
And when we were children, staying at the archduke’s,
My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled,
And I was frightened. He said, Marie,
Marie, hold on tight. And down we went.
In the mountains, there you feel free.
I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter.

[2nd vignette: The second stanza continues to look into the past, after describing the waste land as "stony rubbish." "Son of man" evokes Ezekial 2.1 and Ecclesiastes 12.5. Eliot constructs a sort of dialogue between the son of man and a higher power. THe narrator is desperately seeking for a sign of life ("what are the roots that clutch, what branches grow ?"). Wagner's Tristan und Isolde, an Arthurian tale of adultery and loss, is evoked in the German lines, culminating in "Where do you wait?" This scene is where her love begins. In the story, Isolde overhears Tristan singing this song, bringing ruminations of love promised. Wagner was the first modernizer of opera. The narrator changes, now it could be Eliot himself, pining for the hyacinth girl (maybe his ex wife Vivienne), yet he is rendered impotent ("I could not speak and my eyes failed.") by his love for her. Limbo is described by "neither Living nor dead." Tristan und Isolde is evoked once again, but now speaks to the tragedy of love lost ("Looking into the heart of light, the silence."). The German translates as "Desolate and empty is the sea" as told to Tristan as she waits for the return of Isolde's ship.]

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
Frisch weht der Wind
Der
Heimat zu,
Mein Irisch Kind,
Wo weilest du?
“You gave me hyacinths first a year ago;
They called me the hyacinth girl.”
—Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden,
Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not
Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither
Living nor dead, and I knew nothing,
Looking into the heart of light, the silence.
Ödund leer das Meer.

[3rd vignette: The next stanza shifts the view forward, through the clairvoyante, Madame Sosostris, a character from Aldous Huxley's Crome Yellow. She is a tarot card reader, but not playing with a full deck. In this stanza the narrator becomes the Phoenician sailor. Eliot makes up some of the tarot cards, like the one-eyed merchant - the Lady of the Rocks is Da Vinci's "Madonna of the Rocks." She sees a forbidden scene on a blank card, telling the Sailor to fear death by water. A key theme is reiterated "I see crowds of people walking around in a ring," going nowhere. The stanza ends with her asking the narrator to leave a message for her client, Mrs. Equitone.]

Madame Sosostris, famous clairvoyante,
Had a bad cold, nevertheless
Is known to be the wisest woman in Europe,
With a wicked pack of cards. Here, said she,
Is your card, the drowned Phoenician Sailor,
(Those are pearls that were his eyes. Look!)
Here is Belladonna, the Lady of the Rocks,
The lady of situations.
Here is the man with three staves, and here the Wheel,
And here is the one-eyed merchant, and this card,
Which is blank, is something he carries on his back,
Which I am forbidden to see. I do not find
The Hanged Man. Fear death by water.
I see crowds of people, walking round in a ring.
Thank you. If you see dear Mrs. Equitone,
Tell her I bring the horoscope myself:
One must be so careful these days.


[4th vignette: This final stanza describes a burial procession. Unreal City (Paris for Baudelaire) is from Baudelaire's poem "Seven Old Men." The first few lines are rich with alliteration with the "n" sounds predominating and evoking discordant noise. "A crowd flowed over London" is from Dante's Inferno, in an apocryphal instant where the real world becomes a vision, "I had not thought death had undone so many" is from Canto 3 (evoking the Gates of Hell), "Sighs, short, and infrequent, were inhaled" is from Canto 4 (Limbo). The denizens of London remind Eliot of those without any blame or praise who are relegated to the Gates of Hell, and those who were never baptized and who now dwell in Limbo. The narrator recognizes a friend from the War - Stetson. Mylae refers to the 1st Punic War ! No matter, the point is that all wars are the same. This is echoed in the preface to Baudelaire's Fleurs du Mal - "hypocrite reader - my likeness - my brother," viz all men are the same.]

Unreal City,
Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,
A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
I had not thought death had undone so many.
Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled,
And each man fixed his eyes before his feet.
Flowed up the hill and down King William
Street,
To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours
With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine.
There I saw one I knew, and stopped him, crying “Stetson!
You who were with me in the ships at Mylae!
That corpse you planted last year in your garden,
Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year?
Or has the sudden frost disturbed its bed?
Oh keep the Dog far hence, that’s friend to men,
Or with his nails he’ll dig it up again!
You! hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère!

[The second chapter derives it's name from Thomas Middleton's play. Chess is the quintessential game of The Waste Land - interactions are reduced to movements on a checkered board. The 1st stanza refers to Cleopatra (viz Shakespeare's Antony & Cleopatra). Of course, Cleopatra suffered a failed love affair. Eliot loves Shakespeare as the first modern dramatist. This may also be a reference to Eliot's ex wife Vivienne. The stanza refers to the rape of Philomela by King Tereus in the "sylvan" woods from Ovid's Metamorphosis. Tereus cuts her tongue out to keep her quiet. She and her sister murder the King's son and feed him to the king. Philomela is turned into a nightingale.]

II. A GAME OF CHESS

The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne,
Glowed on the marble, where the glass
Held up by standards wrought with fruited vines
From which a golden Cupidon peeped out 80
(Another hid his eyes behind his wing)
Doubled the flames of sevenbranched candelabra
Reflecting light upon the table as
The glitter of her jewels rose to meet it,
From satin cases poured in rich profusion;
In vials of ivory and coloured glass
Unstoppered, lurked her strange synthetic perfumes,
Unguent, powdered, or liquid—troubled, confused
And drowned the sense in odours; stirred by the air
That freshened from the window, these ascended
In fattening the prolonged candle-flames,
Flung their smoke into the laquearia,
Stirring the pattern on the coffered ceiling.
Huge sea-wood fed with copper
Burned green and orange, framed by the coloured stone,
In which sad light a carvèd dolphin swam.
Above the antique mantel was displayed
As though a window gave upon the sylvan scene
The change of Philomel, by the barbarous king
So rudely forced; yet there the nightingale
Filled all the desert with inviolable voice
And still she cried, and still the world pursues,
“Jug Jug” to dirty ears.
And other withered stumps of time
Were told upon the walls; staring forms
Leaned out, leaning, hushing the room enclosed.
Footsteps shuffled on the stair,
Under the firelight, under the brush, her hair
Spread out in fiery points
Glowed into words, then would be savagely still.

[The next stanza is a good example of the revolutionary use of common language, a discussion between a neurotic wife and a recalcitrant husband. The husband refuses to speak despite her whining insistence that he do so.]

“My nerves are bad to-night. Yes, bad. Stay with me.
Speak to me. Why do you never speak? Speak.
What are you thinking of? What thinking? What?
I never know what you are thinking. Think.”

I think we are in rats’ alley
Where the dead men lost their bones.

“What is that noise?”
The wind under the door.
“What is that noise now? What is the wind doing?”
Nothing again nothing.
“Do
You know nothing? Do you see nothing? Do you remember
Nothing?”
I remember
Those are pearls that were his eyes.
“Are you alive, or not? Is there nothing in your head?”
But
O O O O that Shakespeherian Rag—
It’s so elegant
So intelligent

“What shall I do now? What shall I do?
I shall rush out as I am, and walk the street
With my hair down, so. What shall we do to-morrow?
What shall we ever do?”
The hot water at ten.
And if it rains, a closed car at four.
And we shall play a game of chess,
Pressing lidless eyes and waiting for a knock upon the door.

[The next stanza describes a squalid pub scene at closing time (HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME). Lil is urged to fix herself up before Albert returns from the War. Lil claims the cause of her ravaged looks is from medications for an abortion ("it's them pills I took, to bring it off"). This section constitutes a loose series of phrases connected by "I said(s)" and "she said(s)," perhaps the most poetically experimental section of the poem. The lower class vernacular resists poetic treatment. This section refutes the prevalent claim that iambic pentameter mirrors normal English speech patterns. The rhythms of lower class London speech give way to words of Hamlet's Ophelia to Claudius.]


When Lil’s husband got demobbed, I said,
I didn’t mince my words, I said to her myself,
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
Now Albert’s coming back, make yourself a bit smart.
He’ll want to know what you done with that money he gave you
To get yourself some teeth. He did, I was there.
You have them all out, Lil, and get a nice set,
He said, I swear, I can’t bear to look at you.
And no more can’t I, I said, and think of poor Albert,
He’s been in the army four years, he wants a good time,
And if you don’t give it him, there’s others will, I said.
Oh is there, she said. Something o’ that, I said.
Then I’ll know who to thank, she said, and give me a straight look.
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
If you don’t like it you can get on with it, I said,
Others can pick and choose if you can’t.
But if Albert makes off, it won’t be for lack of telling.
You ought to be ashamed, I said, to look so antique.
(And her only thirty-one.)
I can’t help it, she said, pulling a long face,
It’s them pills I took, to bring it off, she said.
(She’s had five already, and nearly died of young George.)
The chemist said it would be alright, but I’ve never been the same.
You are a proper fool, I said.
Well, if Albert won’t leave you alone, there it is, I said,
What you get married for if you don’t want children?
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
Well, that Sunday Albert was home, they had a hot gammon,
And they asked me in to dinner, to get the beauty of it hot—
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.
Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight.
Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.

[The title of this section is taken from a sermon given by Buddha. In short, the central theme of the next stanza is sex and the dangers of lust. The nymph references are from Spenser's Prothalamion. Images of modern life abound - handkerchiefs, cigarette ends. Leman refers to Lake Geneva - the phraseology comes from Psalm 137.]

III. THE FIRE SERMON

The river’s tent is broken: the last fingers of leaf
Clutch and sink into the wet bank. The wind
Crosses the brown land, unheard. The nymphs are departed.
Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song.
The river bears no empty bottles, sandwich papers,
Silk handkerchiefs, cardboard boxes, cigarette ends
Or other testimony of summer nights. The nymphs are departed.
And their friends, the loitering heirs of city directors;
Departed, have left no addresses.
By the waters of Leman I sat down and wept…
Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song,
Sweet Thames, run softly, for I speak not loud or long.
But at my back in a cold blast I hear
The rattle of the bones, and chuckle spread from ear to ear.

[The legend of the Fisher King is central to Eliot's masterpiece. He has been wounded in the genitals and his lack of potency is the cause of his country becoming a dessicated waste land. Heal the Fisher King and the land will regain its fertility. Only the Holy Grail can reverse the spell. A prior crime or violation serves as cause for the Fisher King's malady. The rape of a maiden may lie at the root, hence Eliot's allusion to the tale of Philomela. We see this legend invoked below, as the narrator becomes the Fisher King. "My brother's wreck" is language taken from both the Tempest is blended with Parzival. Ancient mythology of Actaea and Diana from John Day's Parliament of Bees, is recast as Sweeney and Mrs. Porter. The French is from Verlaine's Parsifal sonnet.]

A rat crept softly through the vegetation
Dragging its slimy belly on the bank
While I was fishing in the dull canal
On a winter evening round behind the gashouse.
Musing upon the king my brother’s wreck
And on the king my father’s death before him.
White bodies naked on the low damp ground
And bones cast in a little low dry garret,
Rattled by the rat’s foot only, year to year.
But at my back from time to time I hear
The sound of horns and motors, which shall bring
Sweeney to Mrs. Porter in the spring.
O the moon shone bright on Mrs. Porter
And on her daughter
They wash their feet in soda water
Et, O ces voix d’enfants, chantant dans la coupole!

[Below is another reference to the rape of Philomela ("so rudely forc'd") by Tereu (Tereus)]

Twit twit twit
Jug jug jug jug jug jug
So rudely forc’d.
Tereu

[Below the "one-eyed" merchant had been named by Sosostris the clairvoyante. The Cannon street Hotel was known in its day for homosexual trysts, as Eugenides was offering the narrator. The currants are symbolic of infertility, dessicated versions of once fertile fruits.]

Unreal City
Under the brown fog of a winter noon
Mr Eugenides, the Smyrna merchant
Unshaven, with a pocket full of currants
C. i. f. London: documents at sight,
Asked me in demotic French
To luncheon at the Cannon Street Hotel
Followed by a week-end at the Metropole.

[The next stanza sees the narrator take on the role of Tiresius, the blind prophet who has lived both as a man and a woman, and is therefore "throbbing bwteen two lives." This Peeping Tom observes a tryst between a typist (pun on the idea that she's just any old type of woman) who is so poor she cannot afford a bed ("on the divan are piled (at night her bed)"). The young man, like Tereus, is full of lust. At the conclusion, she states "Well now that's done: and I'm glad it's over," confirming that absence of love in empty lust, portending sorrow. There is an interweaving of tenderness("caresses" and the word "lover") and violence ("assaults at once" and "His vanity requires no response") in the scene. The stanza ends with words from Goldsmith's Vicar of Wakefield.]

At the violet hour, when the eyes and back
Turn upward from the desk, when the human engine waits
Like a taxi throbbing waiting,
I Tiresias, though blind, throbbing between two lives,
Old man with wrinkled female breasts, can see
At the violet hour, the evening hour that strives

Homeward, and brings the sailor home from sea,
The typist home at tea-time, clears her breakfast, lights
Her stove, and lays out food in tins.
Out of the window perilously spread
Her drying combinations touched by the sun’s last rays,
On the divan are piled (at night her bed)
Stockings, slippers, camisoles, and stays.
I Tiresias, old man with wrinkled dugs
Perceived the scene, and foretold the rest—
I too awaited the expected guest.
He, the young man carbuncular, arrives,
A small house-agent’s clerk, with one bold stare,
One of the low on whom assurance sits
As a silk hat on a Bradford millionaire.
The time is now propitious, as he guesses,
The meal is ended, she is bored and tired,
Endeavours to engage her in caresses
Which still are unreproved, if undesired.
Flushed and decided, he assaults at once;
Exploring hands encounter no defence;
His vanity requires no response,
And makes a welcome of indifference.
(And I Tiresias have foresuffered all
Enacted on this same divan or bed;
I who have sat by Thebes below the wall
And walked among the lowest of the dead.)
Bestows one final patronizing kiss,
And gropes his way, finding the stairs unlit…

She turns and looks a moment in the glass,
Hardly aware of her departed lover;
Her brain allows one half-formed thought to pass:
“Well now that’s done: and I’m glad it’s over.”
When lovely woman stoops to folly and
Paces about her room again, alone,
She smoothes her hair with automatic hand,
And puts a record on the gramophone.

[The music transports the reader back to the city, opening with another line from the Tempest. Eliot describes a bustling bar on the Thames.]

“This music crept by me upon the waters”
And along the Strand, up Queen Victoria Street.
O City City, I can sometimes hear
Beside a public bar in Lower Thames Street, 260
The pleasant whining of a mandoline
And a clatter and a chatter from within
Where fishmen lounge at noon: where the walls
Of Magnus Martyr hold
Inexplicable splendour of Ionian white and gold. 265

[The next stanza quotes Wagner's Die Gotterdammerung, in which maidens upon the Rhine, having lost their goldm sing a song of lament: "Weialala leia / Wallala leialala." Then, a quick allusion to Queen Elizabeth I and the Earl of Leicester, in an amorous encounter. Eliot is doing something here quite profound, antithetical to the legend of the Fisher King. For political reasons, QEI was required to represent herself as constantly available for marriage (to royalty from countries with whom England may have wanted an alliance) - out of this need came the myth of the Virgin Queen. This is the opposite of the Fisher King - to protect the vitality of the land, QEI had to compromise her own sexuality; whereas in the Fisher KIng story, the renewal of the land comes with the renewal of the Fisher King's sexual potency. The twisted logic underlying QEI's public sexuality mirrors and distorts the Fisher King plot and further questions the possibility for renewal, through sexuality, in the modern world.]

The river sweats
Oil and tar
The barges drift
With the turning tide
Red sails 270
Wide
To leeward, swing on the heavy spar.
The barges wash
Drifting logs
Down Greenwich reach 275
Past the Isle of Dogs.
Weialala leia
Wallala leialala
Elizabeth and Leicester
Beating oars 280
The stern was formed
A gilded shell
Red and gold
The brisk swell
Rippled both shores 285
South-west wind
Carried down stream
The peal of bells
White towers
Weialala leia 290
Wallala leialala

[QEI now speaks of birth in Highbury and lost virginity in Richmond and Kew, knowing her people expect nothing of her.]

“Trams and dusty trees.
Highbury bore me. Richmond and Kew
Undid me. By Richmond I raised my knees
Supine on the floor of a narrow canoe.“ 295

“My feet are at Moorgate, and my heart
Under my feet. After the event
He wept. He promised ‘a new start.’
I made no comment. What should I resent?”

“On Margate Sands. 300
I can connect
Nothing with nothing.
The broken finger-nails of dirty hands.
My people humble people who expect
Nothing.” 305

la la

[We revisit the Punic War and end on the somber futile note of "burning" referring to Buddha's sermons. All of man's struggles are futile. There will be no resurrection, as we will learn in the final stanza.]

To Carthage then I came

Burning burning burning burning
O Lord Thou pluckest me out
O Lord Thou pluckest 310

burning

[The title, a recurring theme, fulfills the prophesy of Madame Sosostris. The most formally organized section of the poem, it consists of four pairs of rhyming couplets. This section rebuts ideas of renewal and regeneration. Phlebas just dies - that's it. Phlebus is not resurrected or transfigured.]

IV. DEATH BY WATER

Phlebas the Phoenician, a fortnight dead,
Forgot the cry of gulls, and the deep seas swell
And the profit and loss.
A current under sea 315
Picked his bones in whispers. As he rose and fell
He passed the stages of his age and youth
Entering the whirlpool.
Gentile or Jew
O you who turn the wheel and look to windward, 320
Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.

[The final section is dramatic in imagery and events. The first half builds to an apocalyptic climax. The "unreal" cities of Jerusalem, Athens, Alexandria, Vienna, and London are destroyed. A decaying chapel is described, suggesting the chapel in the Holy Grail. A cock crows and the rains come. No heroic figure arrives to claim the Grail.]

V. WHAT THE THUNDER SAID

[The initial imagery is from the crucifixion of Christ. The garden is Gethsemane. Agony is torture and execution. Thunder of Spring is the earthquake following crucifixion. Significantly, Christ is not resurrected here - "He who was living, is now dead." Release comes from the random call of a barnyard animal.]

After the torch-light red on sweaty faces
After the frosty silence in the gardens
After the agony in stony places
The shouting and the crying 325
Prison and place and reverberation
Of thunder of spring over distant mountains
He who was living is now dead
We who were living are now dying
With a little patience 330

Here is no water but only rock
Rock and no water and the sandy road
The road winding above among the mountains
Which are mountains of rock without water
If there were water we should stop and drink 335
Amongst the rock one cannot stop or think
Sweat is dry and feet are in the sand
If there were only water amongst the rock
Dead mountain mouth of carious teeth that cannot spit
Here one can neither stand nor lie nor sit 340
There is not even silence in the mountains
But dry sterile thunder without rain
There is not even solitude in the mountains
But red sullen faces sneer and snarl
From doors of mud-cracked houses
If there were water 345
And no rock
If there were rock
And also water
And water
A spring 350
A pool among the rock
If there were the sound of water only
Not the cicada
And dry grass singing
But sound of water over a rock 355
Where the hermit-thrush sings in the pine trees
Drip drop drip drop drop drop drop
But there is no water

Who is the third who walks always beside you?
When I count, there are only you and I together 360
But when I look ahead up the white road
There is always another one walking beside you
Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded
I do not know whether a man or a woman
—But who is that on the other side of you? 365

What is that sound high in the air
Murmur of maternal lamentation
Who are those hooded hordes swarming
Over endless plains, stumbling in cracked earth
Ringed by the flat horizon only 370
What is the city over the mountains
Cracks and reforms and bursts in the violet air
Falling towers
Jerusalem Athens Alexandria
Vienna London 375
Unreal

A woman drew her long black hair out tight
And fiddled whisper music on those strings
And bats with baby faces in the violet light
Whistled, and beat their wings 380
And crawled head downward down a blackened wall
And upside down in air were towers
Tolling reminiscent bells, that kept the hours
And voices singing out of empty cisterns and exhausted wells.

[The scene shifts to the Ganges. Eliot draws on the traditional interpretation of "what the thunder says" as taken from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (Hindu fables). According to these fables, the thunder (God delivering to his disciples) "gives," "sympathizes," and "controls" through its "speech." The meditations bring about a sort of reconciliation, or a chance to test the potential of the modern world. A Fisher King-type figure is shown sitting on the shore preparing to put his lands in order, a sign of his imminent death or abdication.

Eliot fails to find signs of giving - he links "Datta" with a description of lust. Is this the primary sin of man ? Yet Eliot concedes "By this, and this only, we have existed." Baudelaire argues that evil actions are better than none because they prove existence, better than inaction, which signifies nothing. Is this an antecedent for Existentialism ? Man's lustful deeds are "not to be found in our obituaries," they remain intangible. For once, Eliot suggests the value of a "moment's surrendor" of giving up control for one fleeting instant, no matter the consequences. Is "an age of prudence" worth the trouble ?

Next comes sympathy - "dayadvham." Eliot asks the reader to show compassion for lustful men and women. "I have heard the key" refers to Dante's Inferno, in which Count Ugolino starves to death after being locked in a tower for treason. Eliot implies that individuals are so caught up in his or her own fate, only thinking of the key to his or her own prison, oblivious to anything but ethereal rumors of others. The allusion to Coriolanus completes the cycle: a Roman who turned his back on Rome. Eliot asks us to acknowledge their pain.

Finally, control ("beating obedient to controlling hands") - "damyata." Control implies a series of domineering relationships and surrendors to the self. Yet he evokes the upbeat "Gaily to the hand expert with sail and oar," like the boat upon which Isolde hears the sailor's song. We have returned to the beginnings of love, the promise of a joyful future. "Your heart" may be a reference to Eliot's wife Vivienne, suggesting that romance may be rekindled, although "would have responded" implies a negative, a token of what might have been, and not what is.

In this decayed hole among the mountains 385
In the faint moonlight, the grass is singing
Over the tumbled graves, about the chapel
There is the empty chapel, only the wind’s home.
It has no windows, and the door swings,
Dry bones can harm no one. 390
Only a cock stood on the roof-tree
Co co rico co co rico
In a flash of lightning. Then a damp gust
Bringing rain

Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves 395
Waited for rain, while the black clouds
Gathered far distant, over Himavant.
The jungle crouched, humped in silence.
Then spoke the thunder
DA 400
Datta: what have we given?
My friend, blood shaking my heart
The awful daring of a moment’s surrender
Which an age of prudence can never retract
By this, and this only, we have existed 405
Which is not to be found in our obituaries
Or in memories draped by the beneficent spider
Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor
In our empty rooms
DA 410
Dayadhvam: I have heard the key
Turn in the door once and turn once only
We think of the key, each in his prison
Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison
Only at nightfall, aetherial rumours 415
Revive for a moment a broken Coriolanus
DA
Damyata: The boat responded
Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar
The sea was calm, your heart would have responded 420
Gaily, when invited, beating obedient
To controlling hands

[Eliot tempers the hope of the previous lines with the evocation of despair.]

I sat upon the shore
Fishing, with the arid plain behind me
Shall I at least set my lands in order? 425

London Bridge is falling down falling down falling down

[After more Dante, an excerpt from Nerval involving "Le Prince d'Aquitaine" points to a crumbling tower - "la tour abolie." The narrator is still attempting to stave off destruction "These fragments I have shored against my ruins." Fragments is such an apt word to describe the poem's form. "Ile fit you" comes from the archaic word "fit" - section of a poem. Eliot makes it a verb, he creates art in the face of madness. "Hieronymo's mad againe" is a reference to Thomas Kyd's The Spanish Tragedie, a 16th century text in which Hieronymo lapses into insanity after his son is murdered. The brutality and violence of man come to mind. What became of generosity, sympathy, and control ? Eliot repeats the Eastern dictum: "Datta, Dayadvham, Damyata." These three words hold out the promise of salvation. The benediction "Shantih shantih shantih" is a blessing, putting to rest the sins and faults that have preceded it. Interpretations of "The Waste Land" as unrelentingly pessimistic do little justice to the hopefulness of these last lines. Eliot implores Western and Eastern religious traditions to posit a more universal world view. Eliot serves up a global vision of the world as wasteland, awaiting the arrival of the Grail that will cure it of its ills. The poem suggests that Grail is still within reach.

Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina
Quando fiam ceu chelidon—O swallow swallow
Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie
These fragments I have shored against my ruins 430
Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe.
Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.


Shantih shantih shantih

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Children of Jihad by Jared Cohen


Jared Cohen is a Stanford Univ. graduate and Rhodes Scholar, hails from Weston, CT, and has toured in the most dangerous regions of Africa and the Mideast. At 24, he was the youngest-ever member of the Secretary of State's Policy Planning Staff and a close advisor to Condoleeza Rice and Hillary Clinton. He is now Director of Google Ideas.

His book Children of Jihad (2007) reads a bit like a 007 thriller, starting in Iran in 2004, passing through Lebanon and Syria, culminating in a potentially deadly wayward visit in 2005 to Iraq. Cohen developed a never-say-die attitude in war-torn Africa, including hanging out with AK-47-toting teenagers in Sierra Leone.

He seems fearless in the Mideast, often revealing his Jewish identity when his life was on the line, say, at a club in Beirut with young Hezbollah operatives. Yet his experience with indigenous youth was almost always a positive one, despite their attitudes toward Israel and for that matter, the U.S. More than anything, this is a book of startling contrasts, from Ferraris (Beirut Ferrari showroom in photo) and Lamborghinis (p. 109) plying the streets of Beirut to Syrian nomads enjoying 200 channels on satellite TV in the desert. Let me relate a few random observations from this fascinating book.

Iran. Cohen makes a beeline for the universities in an effort to engage students in conversation. The young women in Tehran seem to live in a bipolar state of western wear concealed under the veil. In public, the black hejab (head scarf) and the black chador (long robe) have defined womanhood since the Islamic Revolution. Once entering a club, the veils all end up in a pile in the corner. Youth gather for outdoor partying on Fereshteh St., showing off their cars and listening to hip-hop music. They are nearly unanimous in their disdain of the authoritarian Government and of the hard line leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Inconsistencies stretch the imagination - Tehran is home to 11 fully functional synagogues (Synagogue Haim in photo), each one catering to an active congregation (p. 105). There are even two Kosher restaurants ! On a ride back from Esfahan, the taxi driver pointed out the Natanz nuclear facility, a uranium enrichment plant capable of making nuclear weapons. Cohen is surprised to learn that most young people are supportive of the nuclear effort and take pride in it, never considering the ultimate danger in weaponization.

Cohen notes that "the Internet is a place where Iranian youth can operate freely, express themselves, and obtain information on their own terms...users of the Internet in Iran can be anyone and say anything they want as they operate free from the grips of the police-state apparatus...It is true that the Government tries to monitor their online discussions and interactions, but this is a virtually impossible enterprise" (pp. 56-57). Not so ! says Morozov in his book Net Delusion. He says "Cohen is given to dangerously excessive cyber-utopianism" (p. 157).

Lebanon. There is more political and social freedom in Lebanon than anywhere else in the Mideast (p. 135). Cohen is overwhelmed by the vibrancy of Beirut nightlife. Clubbing in Monot, he met Muslims, Christians, Druze, Palestinians, and Syrians. He observed that Beirut had become home to women from Saudi Arabia and other Muslim states, who wanted to escape the veil. He also learned that young Lebanese have discovered that members of rival religious groups make perfect anonymous romantic partners (p. 112). Sleeping with the enemy is the best way for Lebanese youth to guarantee that their nighttime indiscretions never see the light of day.

In March of 2005, hundreds of thousands of Lebanese came to Martyrs' Square to make their demands heard. They celebrated unity between Christians and Muslims. The Cedar Revolution was the first time Lebanese had come together to do something other than party. Syria withdrew its troops and Lebanon was sovereign.

Cohen would hang out at T.G.I. Friday's on Marrad Street (photo), the city's best place to people watch. It was here that he would meet members of Hezbollah and reveal that he was a Jewish American. The members claimed they were against terrorism, against Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. Hezbollah arranged for Cohen to visit the Palestinian refugee camp Ayn al-Hilwah, a very dicey endeavor. Cohen was entering a danger zone with al Qaeda sympathizers like Asbat al-Ansar, a Sunni terrorist group. Under the Cairo Agreement, Palestinian camps were away from civilian centers and the Palestinians would be responsible for their own security. In the camp, Cohen met with General Mounir Maqdah, chief military authority over 350,000 Palestinians in Lebanon, wanted by both the Lebanese and Israelis.

Syria. Syria has long been one if the most nationalistic societies in the Mideast, it is the birthplace of Arab nationalism. The concept of Greater Syria involved taking sovereignty over Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and parts of Turkey. A shift toward totalitarian autocracy began in 1963 with the secular Ba'ath Party. Ba'athism was a contradiction of Islamist extremist movements like the Muslim Brotherhood and Shi'as in Iraq. Hafez al-Assad reigned a police state from 1970 - 2000. His son, Bashar, an ophthalmologist in London, was groomed for the presidency starting in 1994. Unlike Iraq, the more fundamentalist Sunni are the majority of the country, but it is the Shi'a that rule. Unlike much of the Mideast, Syrians believe in country first, clan second. Cohen heads east across the Palmyra desert, seeing the ruins, as he contemplates a daredevil visit to Iraq. He visits the ruins of Dura Europa, home of Syria's oldest synagogue. Ultimately he has a taxi drop him off at the Ibrahim Khalil gates to enter into the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Iraq. Despite counsel from everyone he met on his trip, he entered the Iraqi Region of Kurdistan, expecting the worst, but found a welcome reception everywhere he went. Though they are Muslims like most people in the Mideast, the Kurds are not Arabs. The waterfalls at Geli Eli Beg (photo) were a highlight of his visit. he visited Salahaddin Univ. in Arbil, one of the best in Iraq. Young Kurdish students showed him images of Halabjah (photo), where Saddam Hussein gassed the city in 1988, killing 5,000 people. Cohen saw images of skin melting off people's faces.

The final chapter reads like a Hollywood movie script. Cohen's taxi driver heads south to the nearest border crossing back to Syria. Cohen wakes up from a nap in 130 degrees heat to discover hat the driver had taken him into Mosul, but the driver was gone !! Had the driver been an entrepreneur and informed the locals that he had an American Jew in the car ? At this point, Cohen truly believed his life was in danger at the heart of the Iraqi insurgency war zone. Fortunately, the driver returned, having gone to buy black market gas at 9 cents/gallon. Happily, it had been the driver's intention to exit Iraq at Rabea'a.














































Saturday, July 9, 2011

Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age by Clay Shirky


Clay Shirky has written a sequel (2010) to Here Comes Everybody. Cognitive surplus relates to the amount of free time that humans have to engage in activities of their choice. Consumptive acts like watching TV have dominated our free time since the 1940s. Work, sleep, and watching TV are the 3 most common activities of mankind. Shirky views compulsive TV viewing as a modern version of the Gin Craze in 18th century London, where the masses binged as a self-anesthetizing response to epochal social disruptions.

Television reduces human contact - a social surrogacy phenomenon. Shirky defines a metric for the sum total of cognitive surplus in the aggregate of educated people. Wikipedia (counting every edit in every language) represents about 100 million hours of cumulative human thought. Americans watch 200 billion hours of TV every year, or 2,000 Wikipedias of free time.

Media is like a triathlon - People consume, produce, and share. Now, interactive media are shifting our behavior away from broadcast media that are purely consumptive. While the Internet is 40 years old and the Web is 20 years old, some people are astonished that individual members of society, previously happy to spend most of their free time consuming, would start voluntarily making and sharing things. People often worry about the negative impact of digital media on face-to-face contact, yet political actions brought about by Facebook and Twitter enable large scale assembly.

Shirky develops a typical oversight he dubs a "milkshake mistake." McDonald's wanted to improve sales of milkshakes, so it hired researchers to figure out how to improve the product. One researcher studied the customers instead of the product. One surprising discovery was that many were purchased for breakfast. Also, the buyers were alone, they only bought the shake, and they never drank it in the store. Customers were buying the shake so they could eat while driving. The researchers made two milkshake mistakes: (1) everything important about the product was implicit in its attributes, (2) treat habits as deeply rooted traditions instead of accumulated accidents. The same mistakes can be made thinking about media. The possibility of the social uses of media tools wasn't implicit in the tools themselves. The pure consumption of traditional media was never a sacred tradition, it was a set of accumulated accidents.

Ushahidi (Swahili for "witness") was developed to help citizens track outbreaks of ethnic violence in Kenya. When the Kenyan media banned the broadcast of violence resulting from a disputed election, a Kenyan political activist blogged about the violence. She then asked readers to post comments about the violence on the blog, Kenyan Pundit. As responses flooded in, she enlisted the help of programmers to create a service in 2008 that would automatically aggregate reporting and mapping in real time. Ushahidi developers added the ability to submit info via text message from mobile phones. Governments act less violently when they are being observed. Since its debut, Ushahidi has been expanded to other countries and was used to locate injured in the Haitian and Chilean earthquakes.

Scale makes big surpluses function differently from small ones. Shirky relates how as a 16-year old visiting New York, seeing pizza by the slice was a minor epiphany. With a large enough crowd, unpredictable events become predictable. Once the certainty of demand is divorced from individual customers and remanded to the aggregate, new classes of activity become possible. Shirky quotes Nobel physicist Philip Anderson with his mantra "More is different," after an article in Science (1972). New communications tools are aggregating our individual ability to create and share. Shirky asks what are the chances that a person with a camera will come across an event of global significance ? Extrapolating from an egocentric view can mike the likelihood seem small. Cameras embedded in phones now number over a billion. The chance that someone with a camera will come across an event of global significance is rapidly becoming the chance that such an event has any witnesses at all. Formerly unlikely events become certainties as we share one another's cognitive surpluses in aggregate. The wiring of humanity lets us treat free time as a shared global resource.

When the police want to understand whether someone could have taken a particular action, they look for means, motive, and opportunity. Further, these three aspects help to determine the appearance of new behaviors in society. The following chapters examine the hows, whys, and wheres of cognitive surplus.

Means. Gutenberg introduced movable type in the mid-15th century. He realized that if you made carvings of individual letters, they could be arranged into words and reused. Movable type introduced an abundance of books. A printer could print 300 copies of a book for the same price a scribe could produce a single copy. Hence scribal capacity was given over to reproducing extant works. The idea of bookmaking was centered on re-creating, not producing "novel" books. In an historical eye blink, printers started printing books that were diverse, contemporary, and vulgar (native language), hence the word novel was born. Production of books that no one had ever read before created a new problem - risk ! A printer who printed a book that no one wanted to read would soon be out of business. Printers of Bibles and Aristotle never had that problem. In order to manage that risk, printers were forced to be responsible for the quality of books. The transition from printers to publishers was brought on by the desire to print novel books. This Gutenberg economics is all about the burden of enormous investment costs, evident today in entertainment media like CDs and movies, where 15th century risk management is still invoked.

Before Gutenberg, the average book was a masterpiece. After Gutenberg, erotic novels, dull travelogues, and hagiographies of the landed gentry are of interest to few today. Freedom and quality are conflicting goals. The easier it is for the average person to publish, the more average what gets published becomes. Yet increasing freedom to publish has compensating values, such as an increase in experimentation of form.

Contributors now share creative content with aggregators like Facebook or YouTube, who employ a paid staff. This pattern has been dubbed digital sharecropping, after the post-Civil War sharecroppers who worked the land but didn't own it or the food they grew on it. The people sharing photos and videos don't expect to be paid. It is fundamental that these are acts of sharing rather than production. Their labors are labors of love.

Motive. Doing something because it interests you makes it a different kind of activity than doing it because you are reaping an external reward. Edward Deci at the Univ. of Rochester, distinguish between two broad types of motivation, intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic motivations are those in which the activity itself is the reward. Intrinsic motivations can be characterized by the desire to (1) be autonomous and (2) competent. Extrinsic motivations are those in which the reward for doing something is external to the activity, not the activity itself. The bottom line is that money crowds out love. Note that the origin of the word "amateur" is from the Latin "amare" - "to love", so an amateur is someone who does something for the love of it. For a given activity the two motivations are not additive as payment can crowd out intrinsic motivation. Other psychologists have challenged the crowding-out effect as inapplicable to real world actions and is limited to free choice by the individual. After all, where is this relevant ? In an age where free choice and talent are joint resources, the answer is "Everywhere."

Shirky gets into an interesting discussion of the denizens of FanFiction.net, the community of people who write new stories set in the imagined worlds of existing fictional works. FanFiction hosts more tan half a million Harry Potter stories, not to mention those that are hosted by HarryPotterFanFiction.com. Contributors are looking for little more than attention, often requesting fellow authors to read and review (R&R) their submissions. Authors acknowledge that they do not own the characters or the universe in which they appear, but believe they own new plots. Those authors looking to profit from fanfic are chastised. Most would agree that fanfic authors are not within the normal bounds of copyright law, but they feel they have safe harbor in an act based on love, not money.

Opportunity. Shirky makes an effort to distinguish opportunity from means. Opportunity is viewed as a way of taking advantage of our ability to participate (means) in concert where we previously consumed alone. Cognitive surplus is not merely trillions of hours of free time spread across 2 billion connected individuals. Rather, it is communal, we must combine our surplus free time if it is to be useful, and we can only do that given the right opportunities. Human character is the essential component of our sociable and generous behaviors. High-tech tools enable these behaviors, they do not cause them.

Daniel Kahneman, Nobel economist, coined the term "theory-induced blindness." Remember the milkshake mistake ? The unexpected uses of communications tools are surprising because old beliefs about human nature are poor. Once you stop asking about why people do things for free and just start asking why they are doing them, the concept of intrinsic motivation is part of the explanation.

Behavioral economics is a body of experimental cognitive science that is rapidly growing. It is demonstrating that humans don't always act in self-interested ways. The Ultimatum Game is one of the best known games in social science. It is a two-person interaction, with a proposer and a responder. The game starts when the partner is given $10 and is instructed to share the money between the two of you. The only say you have is whether or not to accept the offer. If you accept she keeps the balance, if you don't accept, neither gets anything. Neoclassical economics predicts your partner will offer $1 and will keep $9. $1 is more than nothing and hence preferable to no deal. In practice the game doesn't work this way, the Proposer typically offer $4-$5, which the Responder typically accepts. The Responder typically refuses lower amounts. This result is a shock to neoclassical economics - what actor would refuse a free dollar for the sake of mere emotional satisfaction ? Versions of this game were run with more money and other variations, but rationality never won out. No group of responders was ever moved to accept a proposed split that deviated too far from some perceived sense of fairness. In the Ultimatum Game people behave as if their relationship matters. Because we are deeply social, participants are hard pressed to assume a role of anonymity. We are incapable of behaving as if we were not members of a larger society. Rejecting ungenerous splits is a communicative and social act rather than a cognitive mistake. It is referred to as "altruistic punishment," since people derive pleasure from punishing wrongdoing.

Friday, July 1, 2011

Here Comes Everybody by Clay Shirky


Here Comes Everybody ("HCE") is a nickname given to Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker in James Joyce's novel Finnegans Wake. HCE is referred to by literally thousands of names throughout Joyce's book. Shirky has adopted it for this seminal work (2008) on the effect of the Internet on group dynamics and traditional business models and the implications for new economies. Shirky is ambitious in his examination of the tectonic shifts impacting communications and media. My approach is to paraphrase the ideas in the first 5 chapters, chapter 7, and the epilogue. Before we start, note that Rosenbloom in The New York Times (6/26/11) comments that Shirky hardlly uses Twitter himself.

It Takes a Village to Find a Phone. Shirky uses an intriguing example of web based methods to retrieve a phone lost in a taxi cab to demonstrate the power of the Internet in solving otherwise intractable problems. This story illustrates how the Web enables groups to assemble and cooperate. The story bears repeating. So Ivanna leaves her Sidekick phone in a NYC taxi, giving up, she buys a new phone. Lo and behold the photos taken on her old phone were being transferred to her new phone, thereby revealing the face and email address of a girl in Queens. Ivanna's techie friend, Evan, emailed Sasha requesting return of the phone. Sasha and boyfriend sent racist invectives, so Evan decided to take the story public. He created a "StolenSidekick" webpage with Sasha's photos and description of the events and added it to his personal website. Friends soon found Sasha on MySpace. An NYPD officer saw the site and contacted Evan to file a claim. Sasha's brother, Luis, Military Police member, contacted Evan to say Sasha had purchased phone from a cabbie, contradicting Sasha's earlier account that her brother found the phone. By now, Evan's story appeared on Digg, a collaborative news website. Soon, the nation's media picked up the story. Someone identified Sasha's home and posted a drive-by video. Now members of Luis' MP unit took notice and became concerned that he was threatening Ivanna. Evan now set up a bulletin board, hosting thousands of members. Evan and Ivanna filed a police report, who classified phone as lost rather than stolen, meaning no action would be taken. NYC Government officials got involved and explained how the complaint could be amended. The public airing of the NYPD's refusal to treat the case as theft generated public outcries. The NYPD caved and arrested Sasha, a 16-year old from Corona. After 10 days, Ivanna had her phone back.

This is a story about the power of leveraging a massive international audience of millions. Thanks to the Web, the cost of publishing globally has collapsed, due to the tools and social structure now in place. The story went from local to international almost immediately. Without the audience, the NYPD would not have changed the complaint. For Sasha, the recovery of the phone was not the only loss she suffered, since Evan's bulletin board named and shamed her on a global platform. This is also a story about the architecture of participation (p. 17). Evan was able to avail himself of capabilities previously reserved for professionals. He told a story without being a journalist, he found Sasha without being a detective. The Web makes it easier for unsupervised groups to self-assemble without requiring formal management (and incurred overhead seen in hierarchical organizations).

Sharing Anchors Community. What is the chance that in a group of 36 people, no two people share a birthday ? With 36 people and 365 birthdays, a 1/10 chance seems reasonable. But in fact it is 8/10 ! This is called the Birthday Paradox (surprise really). Most people get the odds wrong for two reasons. They think in terms that one of the 36 shares their own birthday, which is 1/10. But in a group, you need to count links between people. Consider yourself with 2 other people, A and B. It's not 2 comparisons, but 3: you and A, you and B, and A with B. For 36 people, there are more than 600 pairs of birthdays. A count of "any two people" rises much faster than the number of people themselves.

This growing complexity applies to social settings as well. As a group grows in size, getting universal agreement becomes difficult, then impossible. Ever try to decide on a movie with a group ? This complexity carries over to organizations, hierarchical to render interactions at a minimum. Every transaction an organization undertakes requires time, attention, or money. Because of the high transaction costs, no institution can put all its energies into pursuing its mission. Nobel laureate Coase (1937) considered what would happen if we abandoned organizations, and transacted directly in the marketplace ? Coase reasoned the transaction costs would be too high.

Shirky looks at the photo file sharing site Flickr. Flickr lets the users label or tag their photos as away of arranging them. The photos are linked when two or more users share the same tag. It is vital that Flickr does not bear the cost of organizing the pictures. Nor does it have any obligation to broadcast the categories it has ! Flickr provides a platform for users to aggregate the photos themselves. Flickr reverses the old order of group activity, transforming "gather, then share" into "share, then gather." Flickr escaped the traditional management overhead costs by abandoning any hope of oversight.

Traditional managerial oversight is often illustrated by an org chart, which had its origins in the railroad industry where trains ran in both directions on a single track (2 tracks were too expensive). One gets pretty organized after a few collisions. Hierarchical management of track sections became the answer and lowered transaction costs. At some point an institution cannot grow anymore and remain functional, because the cost of management destroys the profit margin. This is the Coasean ceiling. But what if transaction costs collapse ? Inconceivable in Coase's era. What happens to tasks that aren't worth the cost of managerial oversight ? Until recently, they didn't happen. Think of Flickr. These activities now lie under a Coasean floor. They are valuable to someone but too expensive to be taken on in any institutional way, since they are not worth pursuing. Coasean logic dictates that large decreases i transaction costs create activities that can't be taken on by businesses, because there isn't enough payoff to support the cost of being an institution. Social tools provide an alternative: action by loosely structured groups, operating without managerial direction and outside the profit motive.

For 100 years, a big question has been whether any organizational task was best taken on by Government in a planned way, or by business competing in the market. There has been a universal assumption that people cannot self-assemble. But now we can operate below the Coasean floor. We can now see coverage of tsunamis, coups in Thailand, etc. as the beginning of intense experimentation with these tools. Sharing, cooperation, and collective action form rungs on a ladder of activities enabled by social tools.

Everyone is a Media Outlet. Shirky looks at the traditional role of professionals (gatekeepers) who possess a specialization to solve a problem in a world constrained with scarce resources. Collapse in communications costs have undermined media businesses that traditionally rely on running a printing press or record label. The commercial viability of media businesses involves providing solutions, so preservation of original problems becomes an economic imperative. The Web did not introduce a new competitor in the ecosystem, it introduced a new ecosystem. The future presented by the Internet is mass amateurization (mass professionalism is an oxymoron) of publishing and a switch from "Why publish this?" to "Why not?' What happens when costs of reproduction and distribution go away ? What happens when there's nothing unique about publishing anymore, because users can do it for themselves ? What happens when the basic link between newsworthiness and publication no longer holds ? The lack of trustworthiness in blogs is made up for in the volume of reporting.

Shirky relates an amusing anecdote on 15th century scribes. Only a tiny fraction of the populace could actually write. The scribe would handcopy fragile and decaying manuscripts as an essential service to refresh cultural memory. A scribe's function was indispensable as a bulwark against intellectual loss. At the end of the 1400s, Gutenberg's movable type undermined the scribe profession. The Protestant Reformation was not caused by Gutenberg's invention, but was possible only after Martin Luther could spread complaints against the Catholic Church and print Bibles in local languages. In 1492 Johannes Trithemius launched an impassioned defense of the scribal tradition. Ironically, in order to get the word out, he used a printing press, undermining his message (see image of his book In Defence of Scribes). It is interesting to think that the subsequent spread of literacy was an early example of mass amateurization (p. 79).

In 2006, New York Times reporter Judith Miller was jailed after refusing to reveal her sources in an ongoing federal investigation. This case created a great deal of unease about journalistic privilege. Federal law has no equivalent to state laws (in 49 states) that provide a shield. Members of Congress introduced a bill to provide a federal shield law. It was unanticipated that it would get hung up over who is eligible as a journalist. Definitions of journalist was easy in an era of scarce resources, where journalists were rare. Now, anyone can become a publisher, so anyone can be a journalist. Given that, journalistic privilege becomes a loophole too large to be borne by society. Shirky fails to answer how the federal case was or was not resolved. This conundrum also applies to photography and the mass amateurization of photographers, i.e anyone with a camera phone. These amateur photos may be viewed by millions with no money changing hands. Absent the scarcity that made publishing such a serious-minded pursuit, the written word no longer has a special value in and if itself.

Publish, Then Filter. Personal communications and publishing now blend into each other. AS a result, the old pattern of professional filtering of the good from the mediocre before publication has yielded to social filtering, after the fact. User-generated content is a term used for amateur raw media that users create and share with one another, with no professional oversight. Most user-generated content is not content at all, any more tan a phone call to a family member generates family-generated content. Besides, people don't want professionally produced content for community matters. Shirky considers the amusing case of playing a recorded "Happy Birthday " on the stereo, instead of personally singing it off-key, likely preferred.

Facebook and MySpace are home to millions of users, but most users have an audience of a dozen or less. It is tempting to think of this as a failure, but user-generated content is only intended for a small audience. The posts seem inane because they aren't intended for us, but rather a community that has a social density that large audiences lack.

Communications media (phone, fax, telegrams) are designed for 2-way conversations. Broadcast media is between one sender and many recipients, a one-to-many pattern. Social tools now enable many-to-many conversations that are 2-way. The distinction between communications and broadcast is evaporating. A driving force behind user-generated content is that conversation is no longer limited to social cul-de-sacs like the phone.

While the Web makes interactivity technologically feasible, famous participants promulgate an imbalance between inbound and outbound attention. For someone to be famous, they have to be unable to reciprocate. Removal of technological limits has been replaced by social ones. Oprah has email, but if it became public, it would become useless. Even when a medium is 2-way, the most popular practitioners will be forced into a 1-way pattern. Oprah cannot hope to read thousands of blogs pointed towards her.

Because publishing is hard and expensive, the written word comes with an implicit promise: someone besides the writer thought this was worth reading. The converse of this effect explains our skepticism about self-published books. Mass amateurization has created an enormous filtering problem. Mass amateurization of publishing has invoked mass amateurization of filtering. We have lost the clean distinctions between communications media and broadcast media.

Communications tools don't get socially interesting until they get technologically boring. The invention of a tool doesn't create change; it has to have been around enough that most of society is using it. It's when a technology becomes normal, then ubiquitous, and finally so pervasive as to become invisible, that profound changes happen (p. 105).

Personal Motivation Meets Collaborative Production. Wikipedia is the best known example of distributed collaboration. Founded in 2001, it was an offshoot of the failed Nupedia, an encyclopedia to be written, reviewed and managed by experts volunteering their time. The first wiki was created in 1995 (Hawaiian for "quick"), which was a daring user-editable website. A wiki allows reader/writer crossover. A test wiki was set up on Nupedia, but the BoD objected, so Wikipedia.org was founded. In 2007, over 2 million entries were achieved. Why is it reliable? Because Wikipedia's self-correction process is so robust. Wikipedia has transcended the traditional functions of an encyclopedia, becoming a coordination tool for gathering and distributing information quickly. Within minutes of the 7 July 2005 London bombings, a Wikipedia page was set up and over 1,000 edits were added in the first 4 hours.

Without management, Wikipedia relies on spontaneous divisions of labor. Once an article is started, it attracts readers. Every edit is itself provisional, as is human knowledge, the articles are never finished. Wikipedia's contributors work on what they want to, when they want to, avoiding traditional obligations of workers in an institution. Wiki does not need to make sure its contributors are competent, productive, or even showing up. Nupedia failed because it was an expert-driven system. Mass amateurization removes the technological obstacles to participation. Interestingly, equality of participation does not follow, but obeys a power law distribution, which tracks the imbalance of participation. Wiki articles with hundreds of contributors typically have a few that do the most work. Apparently, the imbalance drives large social systems rather than damaging them. The "average" user is nonexistent (implying "bell curve" distributions). The 80/20 rule (Pareto's Law) applies to a store making 80% of revenue from 20% of inventory. This is the basis of long tail economics, where at Amazon, most items don't sell well, but in aggregate they sell huge, brick&mortar stores cannot afford the overhead to stock them. In a power law system, most participants are below average. [If Bill Gates walks into a bar, everyone becomes a millionaire on average!]. To understand the creation of a Wiki article, you can't look for a representative contributor, you have to concentrate on the behavior of the collective.

Faster and Faster. Collective Action is explored using the protests against the GDR in Leipzig in 1989. Gradually growing in numbers, they took advantage of an information cascade. The 3 levels of shared awareness were key - (1) when everybody knows something, (2) when everybody knows that everybody knows, and (3) when everybody knows that everybody knows that everybody knows. Shirky also talks about the rise of flash mobs and the ice cream events in Minsk, Belarus. Effectively, these flash mobs are not planned, but coordinated at the last minute using social tools. An historical example was the Nazi's use if radios in tanks, which gave them superiority over France. Mobile phones now provide a shift away from advance planning. People now make less definite plans - they can call at the last minute to make arrangements.

Evan Williams developed a website that would take text that a user entered into a form, and post it onto a webpage, known as Blogger, later acquired by Google. That social tool enables this blog you are reading. He then focused on mobile phones and created Twitter. Twitter was first used in a political activist context to make sure that Egyptian activists successfully passed through borders or checkpoints.

Epilogue. The epilogue is interesting as it provides a springboard for the social tools that have come to fruition in the Arab Spring with the ouster of Ben Ali from Tunisia (14JAN2011) and Hosni Mubarak from Egypt (11FEB2011). Shirky introduces the concept of "net value." One has to wonder if this was the inspiration for Evgeney Morozov titling his book Net Delusion. Regardless, Shirky makes the case that increased flexibility and power for group action will have more good effects than bad ones, making the current changes positive. The Abbot of Sponheim never understood this tradeoff - he was operating under the "lump of labor" fallacy, meaning any labor-saving device must make society worse off. He never stopped to think of new jobs in the printing press industry. One weakness of net value arguments recognizes that the good and bad changes are incommensurable, which is to say that the value of new sources of knowledge like Wikipedia cannot be measured against the increased resilience of networked terrorist groups. Further, when a real revolution is going on, net value is problematic. Societies before and after revolution are too different to be readily compared. Regardless of incommensurability, the ability of people to do and say as they like is inarguably good.

Shirky cannot resist a final anecdote about Venetian printer Aldus Manutius, who published a translation of Virgil's works in 1502. Manutius chose to publish in the octavo size, small enough to fit into saddlebags and enable easy transport. This was a small revolution, allowing the book to also shrink in cost. In an echo of the salacious nature of new content in many modern media (after all, pornography drove VHS), Manutius published the Hypnerotomachia, a contemporary novel with erotic passages, creating a market for new fiction. This certainly hints at audio downsizing with MP3, creating new markets for teenagers who live the principle of "good enough is good enough."

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Media Relations Department of Hizbollah Wishes You a Happy Birthday by Neil MacFarquhar


Little did I know when I started reading this book how it dovetailed so nicely with Friedman's book below. In fact, Neil MacFarquhar was also a journalist for The New York Times as Cairo bureau chief (2001-2005). From the age of 3, he grew up in Marsa Brega, a Mediterranean coastal Libyan oil town run by Esso. As a 7-year old he scribbled in large wobbly letters into a spiral-bound notebook on June 5, 1967 "The war started with boming in Kiro" (p. 1), spelling not yet his forte. He has fond memories of his childhood in the compound, including crusty loaves of bread, a legacy of the Italian occupation. We learn a lot about the quirky Qadhafi, including his female bodyguards (see photo). As a Deerfield Academy student, he would return home to Libya on vacations. Later, during the time he wrote this book he was hit by a bus in 1997 in Manhattan, an ironic twist of fate after dodging bullets in Iraq, Kabul, Sarajevo, and Gaza. He emerged from a coma at Bellevue (p. 67).

The existence of an impenetrable police state is the ultimate frustration in generating change to the region. The absence of civil rights: "the stifling control of the secret police; the absence of any rule of law even if the constitution guarantees it; … the inherent difficulty in working alone because organizing is mostly banned" (p. 180). In Syria, it is against the law for more than 5 people to gather without a permit (p. 328). The author had little to clue him of the coming Facebook Revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt, and Bahrain. Moreover, the West has to learn how to speak to Islam on its own terms - to laud justice rather than "democracy," which has little respect in the Muslim world because "it elevates man's laws over those of God" (p. 271).

MacFarquhar belabors U.S. shortcomings in its dealings with the Mideast. The "cow vs. cow competition was a telling example of how the political rivalry between competing visions of the future played out on the ground removed from the standard rhetorical jousting between Tehran and Washington" (p. 60). The U.S. supplied $1,900 dairy cows to wean Lebanese farmers off of growing hashish. Feed was too expensive and had to be imported. Iran stepped in with cheaper cows ($1,000) and $50 million farm aid. So much for the U.S. helping domestic farmers sell surplus cows to Lebanon.

The author praises the mission of Qatar-based Al-Jazeera TV coverage of the Arab world. "al-Jazeera" is Arabic for "the peninsula." "The range of criticism against repressive governments, the sheer number of opposition voices never heard before, and the wide focus on socially taboo subjects such as police torture or spousal abuse started with Al-Jazeera" (p. 73). The unfiltered CSPAN-like station horrified and angered Arab dictators used to exercising complete control over the news, scrambling to silence it. Egypt, Bahrain, and others "accused it of being underwritten by Zionist bogeymen" (p. 76). MacFarquhar remarks that "If American officials were a little more savvy, they would have realized from the beginning that Al-Jazeera offered them a highly effective platform to address a massive swath of the Arabic public directly" (p. 82).

Westerners equate the term "fatwa" with a death sentence, as was issued by the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989 against Salman Rushdie for blaspheming Islam in The Satanic Verses. But fatwas can be devoted to any topic and are the "grease that smooths all manner of daily decisions" (p. 123). Tehran vasectomy clinic founder, Freidoun Forouhari, had the same Khomeini issue a fatwa condoning the procedure as acceptable male contraception. Ironically, Forouhari was murdered by rogue elements to eliminate reformists, which underscored how easy it was for ideologues to ignore any fatwa that contradicted their own version of Islam. Saudi Arabia served as the font of all manner of hostile fatwas. "Innovation, or "bidaa" in Arabic, is a dirty word in the Kingdom" (p. 139).

MacFarquahar also does a clear exposition on Jihad, the justification of violence against oppression. Attitudes toward Jihad changed 180 degrees after a 2004 bombing of the traffic police headquarters in Riyadh. Attitudes change when the killing arrives on the doorstep. There has been much talk about overhauling the religion. Arab cities like Damascus, Aleppo, Baghdad, and Cairo were once famous for their cosmopolitan mix of citizens. "Unfortunately, with oil, Bedouin Islam has prevailed" (p. 169). The Koran cannot be parsed the same way as the Bible. If Jews or Christians decide certain passages in the Bible are obsolete, they are reinterpreted or abandoned. Since the Koran is taken as "the word of God to be applied to all places and all times," this option is not available (p. 170).

MacFarquhar does a good job examining the U.S. efforts to democratize the region, often from a naive standpoint. Tribalism and minority rule are sticking points. Iraq became the messiest experiment in changing the practice of minority rule. Bahrain is close to Iraq in the Sunni minority rule. Since the 1970s, oil rich Gulf states have survived by creating comfortable welfare states. In the 1980s, Bahrain turned itself into a regional financial hub, filling the vacuum left by Beirut. Bahrain;s head of economic development devised a simple metric for establishing reform in terms of barrels of oil per citizen. Countries with less than one would be forced to reform (Kuwait was at 5, Qatar at 9, Bahrain at 3)(p. 237). Separation between church and state is problematic. America benefited from doing so in an era that was conducive (1776), not so easily replicated now. The parliamentary system contradicts Sharia (p. 299). Nevertheless, there is a famous Koranic verse "Wa amruhum shura binahum" or "the affairs of men are a matter for consultation among them (p. 327).

Careful what you wish for is on target when pushing for democracy. Hamas' election in the Gaza strip backfired for the U.S. Support of Mubarak, despite his dictatorship, was seen as a way to stem the tide of radical Islam. MacFarquhar sees 2005 as the high point of American support for reform, it has been downhill ever since (p. 352).

The book is prescient in terms of current events regarding the Arab Spring. Ali Abdulemam, Bahrain's notorious webmaster is mentioned (p. 221) in his efforts to bring revolutionaries together at Bahrainonline.org. By 2008, 1/4 of the population was visiting his site (p. 227). The author mentions Facebook as a means to rally support for reform (p. 304). In the closing paragraph, the author notes that "Facebook is spawning political groups in Egypt, groups that succeed at overcoming government laws that ban organizing and the right of assembly" (p. 359).

Friday, June 10, 2011

From Beirut to Jerusalem by Thomas L. Friedman



Thomas Friedman graduated from Brandeis in 1975 with a degree in Mediterranean Studies followed by an M.Phil. in Middle Eastern Studies at St. Antony's College at Oxford Univ. He then joined the London Bureau of UPI and went to Beirut in 1979 - 1981. The New York Times subsequently hired him as Beirut correspondent at the start of the 1982 Israeli Invasion of Lebanon. His coverage of the Sabra and Shatila Massacre won him his 1st of 3 Pulitzer Prizes. He was assigned to Jerusalem from 1984-1988 as the Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief. This book was published in 1989 and would earn him his 3rd Pulitzer. Much of the worst struggles between Palestinians and Israelis would come at the 2nd intifada (2000-2005), well after the book's publication. I cannot imagine a book that lays a better foundation for understanding the conflict.

I met Friedman September, 2007 in Dalian, China, at the World Economic Forum and I can tell you from seeing him in action that he is not afraid to state his opinion. Reading this book will help explain why he is a very tough journalist. His Beirut internment imbued him with nerves of steel. Critics have either attacked him for being too anti-Israel or too pro-Israel. I was amazed at how a Jewish reporter could take issue with how the Israelis invaded Lebanon. My comments are not intended to be comprehensive but rather random observations.

Lebanon became a republic in 1943 comprised mainly of Maronite Christians and Druse Muslims. One cannot hope to understand Lebanon without appreciating the fundamental schism (p. 12) between Sunnis (Sunna is Arabic for tradition) and Shiites (Shia means partisans" of Ali). Lebanese traditionally derive their social identity from tribal origins, rather than the nation as a whole. Beirut historically thrived on the peaceful coexistence of Shiites, Sunnis, Christians, and Druse (p. 214). The spirit of Beirut is what was known as the Levantine spirit. Levantine is derived from the Old French levant, meaning rising (where the sun rose).

Friedman compares 1980s Beirut to a perfect Hobbesian "state of nature" that Hobbes described in the Leviathan that would exist if government and society completely broke down, where every man is enemy to every man. Hobbes argued that man is only moral in a social context, Hobbes was originally defending the Monarchy.

When Friedman arrives in Beirut in 1982, he immediately witnesses the Hama Massacre across the Syrian border. Hama was a Sunni Muslim town of 180,000. Syria (like Iraq) is a secular country in which the ruler, Hafez al-Assad (like Saddam Hussein), under the Ba'ath party, has been staving off retrogressive Islamic fundamentalists. In February, 1982, Assad (Alawite tribe) invoked a scorched earth policy against Sunnis in Hama to quell a revolt against his regime. Estimates claim up to 40,000 were killed, many civilians. Friedman refers to this tragic event as the Hama Rules (chap. 4), as it will appear again in relation to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

The Palestine Liberation Organization was founded at the Arab League Summit in Cairo in 1964. The PLO was expelled from Jordan in 1970 and was henceforth exiled in Beirut, until 1982 when the Lebanese Shiites expelled them as well. Friedman calls (p. 107) Arafat the Ronald Reagan of Palestinian politics, nothing sticks to him. Without accepting Israel's right to exist, the PLO was just biding time in Beirut. Ariel Sharon and Yitzhak Rabin took advantage of the PLO isolation in Lebanon as a chance to vanquish them, especially since the Israelis believed they could buddy up with the Maronite Christians, a kindred spirit who had settled in Lebanon as their own homeland. Unfortunately, Israel underestimated the importance of the Sunnis in balancing the governance of the nation (think forward to the U.S. invasion of Iraq). Friedman is comical when he regales stories of Israeli soldiers going on shopping sprees in Beirut, getting all the luxury items they could not get in Israel (p. 131). Thinking Lebanon to be such a friendly place, Israelis had visions of going skiing in Lebanon in the winter.

Historically, Lebanon made its living being the entrepôt between the West and the Arab world. Economically, the Lebanese were in no position to make peace with Israel at the risk of jeopardising their trade relations with other Arab states (p. 136). Further, Israel mistakenly believed eliminating the PLO would solve the Palestine problem, the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza would stop demanding independence. AS soon as the Israelis invaded Lebanon, Arafat's world began to crumble. The PLO was no longer the vanguard of the Arab nationalist revival. Khomeini's revolutionary takeover of Iran in 1979 posed a radical Islamic threat to the Arab oil states that was far more frightening than anything coming out of Israel. Ultimately, the cost of carrying the PLO became too great for the Lebanese Muslims to bear.

In September, 1982, Maronite Phalangists attacked PLO captives in Sabra and Satila camps. The Israelis "discovered" that the Phalangists had been massacring Palestinians in the camps for 3 days. Friedman claims that the Israelis knew of the mass killings. They had so dehumanized the Palestinians in their own minds and equated Palestinian with PLO with terrorist. Sabra and Shatila was a personal crisis for Friedman (p. 164). It was not the heroic Israel that he had been taught to identify with, but a real world nation that played by the Hama Rules. Friedman wrote a 4-page report in the September 26 New York Times which eventually won him the Pulitzer Prize.

By June of 1984, Friedman had been emotionally exhausted by his Beirut experience and took a taxi to the Israeli border on his way to Jerusalem. Friedman found many parallels between Lebanon and Israel, especially as regards political gridlock, calling it "anarchy" in Lebanon and "national unity" in Israel (p. 253). To understand Israel's paralysis, one must go back to the Six-Day War in June 1967, when Israel occupied the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza Strip, extending Jewish control over virtually all the historical land of Israel originally sought by Zionism. Paradoxically, Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza in 1967 put Palestine back together as a geographical entity and put the Palestinians from the West Bank, Gaza, and Israel back together as a single community. Since 1948, Palestine had been broken into 3 entities: the Jews sharing the spoils with Jordan (West Bank) and Egypt (Gaza).

So on the 7th day of the Six-Day War, a momentous decision lay before Israel with 3 choices. A nation of Jews living in all the land of Israel, but not democratic ? A democratic nation in all the land of Israel, but not Jewish ? Or a Jewish and democratic nation, but not in all the land of Israel ? The looming population growth of the Palestinians was the linchpin. Israel's two major parties, Likud and Labor, spent the years 1967-1987 avoiding a choice, not in theory, but in practice (p. 254). In fact this existential choice would drive a wedge among Israel's citizens and lead to internal violence (Grunzweig). To complicate matters, the Old City of Jerusalem, Jericho, Hebron, Nablus and other West Bank towns were the real heartland of historical Jewish consciousness and the stage where the drama of the Bible was actually played out. Simply, after Lebanon and Grunzweig, Israelis wanted unity, not truth (p. 270).

Friedman provides a nice analysis (pp. 285-290) of the internal makeup of Israel’s Jews. Secular Israelis make up 50% of the population. Secular Zionists came to Israel as a rebellion against their grandfathers and the orthodox synagogue-oriented ghetto Judaism practiced in Eastern Europe. Science, technology, and turning the desert green were their new Torah. The secular Zionists built a nationalism without reclaiming Judaism. This is how many Israelis really relate to Judaism (p. 315): I will go into the Army. I will serve. I will make heroic sacrifices in battle. But that's it. The 2nd school consists of religious Zionists (30%) who are traditional or modern Orthodox Jews, who support the secular Zionist state but insist it is not a substitute for the synagogue. The 3rd school is made of messianic religious Zionists (5%) and form the backbone of the Jewish settler movement in the West Bank. For them the rebirth of the Jewish state is not simply a religious event it will culminate with the coming of the Messiah. Finally, there are the ultra-Orthodox, non-Zionist Jews (15%), known as Haredim, “those filled with the awe of God.” They do not see in the reborn state of Israel an event of major religious experience. They are content to live in Israel no matter who is in charge. Each of the four main schools of the Israel identity debate were so convinced the others would wither away, that as a group they were never willing to hammer out a consensus about the meaning of Israel.

In December, 1987, the pot boiled over and the Palestinians revolted countrywide in the 1st intifada. It was an expression of rage at the Israelis who never allowed them to feel at home and the Arabs who were ready to sell them out. The intifada was made in Israel, the PLO was caught by surprise. Intifada is translated as a shudder, a tremor. They did not see themselves as overthrowing Israel as much as purifying themselves of "Israeliness." (p. 375). The strike was not meant to put pressure on Israel it was meant to disconnect the Palestinians from Israel. Living in exile, now Arafat had a golden opportunity to reclaim his influence with the PLO, but accommodated the Palestinian's desire to recognize Israel's right to exist, which Arafat did in December, 1988. This was a major positive result of the intifada.

Historically, the Soviet Union was the first to recognize the Jewish state, yet the good will terminated with Stalin's anti-Semitic rampage. France became the most favored ally in the 1960s and 1970s. Friedman examines the special relation between America and Israel and points to the irony that America was disproving the thesis of Israel's founding fathers. America was attracting more Jews from the Soviet Union, Argentina, and South Africa than Israel, and also attracting thousands of Israelis themselves. Israelis lived under a sustained misconception that American Jews would leave their comfortable lives and emigrate. In America, Jewish life is organized around a synagogue, mainly for communal solidarity rather than religious reasons. In Israel, the vast majority are nonobservant Jews and don't need to join a synagogue to avoid assimilation. The raging debate about amending the Israeli Law of Return revealed how little American Jews and Israeli Jews understood about each other's relationship to Judaism and Israel (p. 476).

A final thought - the French philosopher Montesquieu once said "Happy the people whose annals are blank in history books" (p. 449).